U.S. Declines Direct Engagement with Russia in Ukraine, Citing Different Relationship

The US declines to directly engage Russian forces in Ukraine's airspace, citing differences with Israel's situation. This decision highlights the complex geopolitical considerations and challenges in providing military aid to Ukraine.

author-image
Nitish Verma
New Update
U.S. Declines Direct Engagement with Russia in Ukraine, Citing Different Relationship

U.S. Declines Direct Engagement with Russia in Ukraine, Citing Different Relationship

The United States has declined to engage Russian forces directly over Ukrainian airspace, according to White House and State Department officials. This decision comes despite Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky's calls for Western allies to defend Ukraine in the same way they defended Israel during a recent massive Iranian aerial attack.

John Kirby, the White House National Security Council Strategic Communications Coordinator, explained that the situations in Ukraine and Israel are different in terms of airspace and visual representation. The U.S. has provided Ukraine with weapons to defend its airspace, but Kirby noted that the lack of National Security Supplemental funding is hindering further support.

State Department spokesperson Matthew Miller emphasized that the U.S. relationship with Israel is "entirely different" than that of Ukraine. The U.S. has had a decades-long security partnership with Israel, providing them with direct aid, while its relationship with Ukraine is more recent, only dating back to the start of the conflict with Russia.

Why this matters: The U.S. decision not to engage directly with Russian forces in Ukraine highlights the complex geopolitical considerations and differing relationships between the U.S. and its allies. It also highlights the ongoing challenges in providing sufficient military aid to Ukraine amid domestic political debates.

The White House reaffirmed its stance against passing a standalone aid bill for Israel unless it includes support for Ukraine. U.S. House Speaker Mike Johnson's plan to introduce separate foreign aid bills could further delay aid to Ukraine, which has been effectively blocked for months.

Josep Borrell, the EU's top diplomat, acknowledged that the question of why Western countries cannot defend Ukraine's airspace in the same way they did for Israel is "well-founded," but he noted that the two situations "cannot be compared." Building a system like Israel's Iron Dome "has taken years and years to build and has a very high cost," Borrell said.

The delay in providing assistance to Ukraine has directly affected the battlefield, leading to the loss of the pivotal front-line city of Avdiivka. President Zelensky emphasized that the failure of the U.S. Congress to approve military aid could result in Ukraine losing the war.

The U.S. remains committed to supporting Ukraine's defense and has provided significant military aid, including weapons and air defense systems, over the past two years of the full-scale war. However, deploying Western fighter jets to protect Ukraine would lead to "dangerous escalation," according to U.S. and U.K. officials. They emphasized the need to provide Ukraine with more air defense systems, which are "more effective" in the current situation.

Key Takeaways

  • U.S. declines to engage Russian forces directly over Ukrainian airspace.
  • U.S. relationship with Israel differs from Ukraine, hindering further support.
  • Lack of funding delays military aid to Ukraine, affecting the battlefield.
  • Deploying Western fighter jets to protect Ukraine risks dangerous escalation.
  • U.S. emphasizes providing Ukraine with more effective air defense systems.