Scarlett Johansson's Restraining Order Against Alleged Stalker Dismissed by California Supreme Court

Scarlett Johansson's restraining order against alleged stalker dismissed due to failure to serve court papers, highlighting challenges celebrities face with obsessive fans and the need for improved legal protections.

author-image
Shivani Chauhan
Updated On
New Update
Scarlett Johansson's Restraining Order Against Alleged Stalker Dismissed by California Supreme Court

Scarlett Johansson's Restraining Order Against Alleged Stalker Dismissed by California Supreme Court

In a setback for actress Scarlett Johansson, the California Supreme Court has dismissed her restraining order against alleged stalker Michael Joseph Branham due to a failure to serve court papers. The dismissal comes after Johansson filed the restraining order petition in November 2023, seeking protection for herself and her family from Branham, who claimed to be the father of one of her children.

According to court documents, the harassment began in August 2022 and included Branham allegedly stalking Johansson, following her neighbor, and leaving items at her home. Johansson hired a private investigator, Jon Perkins, who discovered Branham's attempts to establish a parental connection and financial claims. Perkins revealed that Branham had uploaded a picture of himself in front of Johansson's house and expressed a desire to visit her and her son, whom he believed he fathered.

However, the court dismissed the case in 2024 due to the inability to serve the papers to Branham, resulting in a major disappointment for the actress and raising concerns about her and her family's security. Johansson's attorney, Michael Goldstein, confirmed the failure to serve Branham with the necessary court papers, leading to the dissolution of any temporary restraining orders.

Why this matters: This case highlights the ongoing challenges celebrities face with obsessive fans and the legal hurdles in obtaining protection. The dismissal of Johansson's restraining order raises questions about the effectiveness of current laws in addressing celebrity stalking cases and the need for improved measures to ensure the safety of public figures and their families.

Johansson, who is married to 'Saturday Night Live' cast member Colin Jost and has a child with him, emphasized that Branham's actions caused significant fear and concern for her family's safety. Despite the dismissal of the restraining order, Branham is still charged with persistently attempting to contact Johansson's son, Cosmo, whom he believes is his biological child. The actress's case underscores the ongoing struggle celebrities face in dealing with obsessive fans and the importance of effective legal protections.

Key Takeaways

  • Scarlett Johansson's restraining order against alleged stalker dismissed
  • Stalker claimed to be father of Johansson's child, stalked her and family
  • Dismissal due to failure to serve court papers to the stalker
  • Highlights challenges celebrities face with obsessive fans and legal hurdles
  • Stalker still charged for attempting to contact Johansson's son