Siren DIVCON Leaders Dividend ETF Plunges 6% in April Amid Sector Woes

The Siren DIVCON LEAD Dividend ETF experienced a 6% decline in April, its worst monthly performance, due to heavy exposure to struggling tech and industrials sectors. The ETF's decline reflects a broader trend in the market, with investors becoming more cautious and shifting towards defensive sectors.

author-image
Trim Correspondents
New Update
Siren DIVCON Leaders Dividend ETF Plunges 6% in April Amid Sector Woes

Siren DIVCON Leaders Dividend ETF Plunges 6% in April Amid Sector Woes

The Siren DIVCON lead Dividend ETF (LEAD), a standout performer since its inception, experienced a significant decline of around 6% in April, marking one of its worst monthly performances in recent history. The sharp drop was primarily attributed to the fund's heavy exposure to the struggling technology and industrials sectors, which account for approximately 38% and 27% of its assets, respectively.

Why this matters: The decline of LEAD has broader implications for investors and the overall market, as it reflects a shift in sentiment towards more defensive sectors. This trend could have a ripple effect on other ETFs and investment strategies, leading to a reevaluation of risk and return expectations.

The technology sector faced severe challenges in April as a result of valuation concerns and fears of rising interest rates. Meanwhile, the industrials and materials sectors wavered amid signs of moderatingglobalgrowth. LEAD's lack of exposure to defensive sectors like utilities and consumer staples, which held up relatively well during the market turmoil, further exacerbated its decline.

Looking ahead, LEAD may face additional headwinds from rising inflation, which is projected to continue, potentially leading to further turbulence for the fund. Moreover, decelerating GDP growth is expected to slow down, which could negatively impact LEAD's performance. Wildcard factors such as a weakening U.S. dollar and ongoing currency volatility from the Japanese yen add additional risk to the fund's outlook.

Despite its current struggles, LEAD's long-term track record remains exceptional. However, its heavy tech and cyclical tilts may continue to struggle in the current environment. "We're in a period of transition, so I think investors are right to sort of keep their head on a swivel," said Matthew Bartolini, head of SPDR Americas research at State Street Global Advisors.

The slump in LEAD's performance reflects a broader trend in the ETF market, as U.S.-listed ETFs attracted about $35 billion from investors in April, the lowest monthly total since October and below the historical monthly average. This decline in ETF flows suggests investors' renewed concern that the Federal Reserve would keep rates higher for longer than anticipated, following the central bank's decision to hold its benchmark rate steady in April, citing a solid economy with elevated inflation.

Investors in April appeared more cautious about where they put capital at risk, with contributions to equity ETFs falling below historical monthly averages. However, their appetite for cyclical sectors suggests a positive view of the economy. Broad-based commodity ETFs saw their biggest monthly inflows since April 2022, amid worries over sticky inflation, with industrial metals, energy, and precious metals among the top-performing sectors last month.

"Both inflation and deflation cycles tend to last a lot longer than people expect, and we just left a long deflationary cycle," noted Bob Minter, director of ETF investment strategy at Abrdn. The Abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCI) gained 2.4% in April, while stocks and bonds fell, with the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) falling 4% and the iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (AGG) dropping 2.5% on a total return basis.

LEAD's diversified approach and strategy are expected to continue producing alpha over full market cycles amidst this challenging environment. However, unless technology stocks recover or cyclicals regain leadership, the fund may remain underperforming in the near term. Investors should closely monitor the evolving economic environment and assess their risk tolerance when considering investments in sector-specific ETFs like LEAD.

Key Takeaways

  • LEAD ETF fell 6% in April, its worst month in recent history, due to tech and industrials exposure.
  • Decline reflects shift to defensive sectors, impacting ETFs and investment strategies.
  • Rising inflation and slowing GDP growth may further hurt LEAD's performance.
  • ETF market saw lowest monthly inflows since October, indicating investor caution.
  • Commodity ETFs saw big inflows in April, driven by inflation concerns and economic optimism.