Constitutional Court of Indonesia Examines Amicus Curiae Briefs in 2024 Presidential Election Dispute

The Indonesian Constitutional Court faces a crucial decision on the 2024 presidential election dispute, with significant implications for the country's democracy and stability. Amidst allegations of fraud and pressure, the court's verdict is eagerly awaited.

Trim Correspondents
Updated On
New Update
Constitutional Court of Indonesia Examines Amicus Curiae Briefs in 2024 Presidential Election Dispute

Constitutional Court of Indonesia Examines Amicus Curiae Briefs in 2024 Presidential Election Dispute

The Constitutional Court of Indonesia received 52 amicus curiae briefs for the ongoing 2024 presidential election dispute. However, only 14 of these briefs were carefully reviewed by the court, including letters from PDIP leader Megawati Soekarnoputri and former KPK leaders.

The court is scheduled to read out its decision on the 2024 Presidential Election Result Dispute (PHPU) case on Monday, April 22, 2024. The Polda Metro Jaya has alerted 7,783 personnel to secure the presidential election dispute verdict hearing, including the activity of expressing opinions around the Constitutional Court Building.

The hearing on the dispute was held from March 27 to April 5, 2024, with both Anies Baswedan-Muhaimin Iskandar and Ganjar Pranowo-Mahfud MD asking the court to cancel the KPU's decree on the election results, which showed Prabowo Subianto-Gibran Rakabuming Raka as the winners. The court has accommodated a wide range of participation, including calling four ministers as witnesses, which is unparalleled in similar cases.

Why this matters: The Constitutional Court's decision on the 2024 presidential election dispute is seen as a test for Indonesia's sustainability as a country based on the principles of law and democracy. The court's verdict will have significant implications for the political landscape and stability of Indonesia in the coming years.

Public policy expert Sudrajat Maslahat stated that the Constitutional Court is the last hope for the people to obtain justice and that the judges must decide the case fairly and correctly, free from temporary benefits and regime pressures. He warned that the court should not become a "Calculator Court" or be involved in collusion, and that it should focus on the process and quality of the election rather than just the numerical results.

Political analyst and democracy activist Muslim Arbi warned the court against making a wrong decision, as it could lead to a risk of uprising. Arbi pointed out that the evidence of fraud, abuse of power, and intimidation by officials to favor a certain candidate was overwhelming, arguing that the court cannot simply claim its authority is limited to adjudicating mere numbers when the winning numbers came from a corrupt process.

The composition of the court is predicted to be 3:3:2, with three judges accepting the request, three rejecting it, and two undecided. There is a possibility of a 4:4 deadlock, which would be decided by the court president. The formation of the court panel, with the Knesset Speaker as the court president, opens the possibility that the petitions of Anies-Muhaimin and Ganjar

Key Takeaways

  • Constitutional Court received 52 amicus briefs, reviewed 14
  • Court to rule on 2024 presidential election dispute on April 22
  • Judges must decide fairly, avoid being a "Calculator Court"
  • Verdict could impact Indonesia's political stability and democracy
  • Court composition may result in a 4:4 deadlock, decided by president