Indonesian Constitutional Court to Decide on Disqualification of VP Candidate Gibran Rakabuming Raka in 2024 Election Dispute

The Indonesian Constitutional Court is set to rule on a high-stakes election dispute, with far-reaching implications for the country's democracy. The decision will determine the legitimacy of the 2024 presidential election and test the judiciary's independence.

author-image
Rizwan Shah
Updated On
New Update
Indonesian Constitutional Court to Decide on Disqualification of VP Candidate Gibran Rakabuming Raka in 2024 Election Dispute

Indonesian Constitutional Court to Decide on Disqualification of VP Candidate Gibran Rakabuming Raka in 2024 Election Dispute

The Constitutional Court (MK) in Indonesia is set to deliver its decision on Monday, April 22, 2024, regarding a dispute over the results of the 2024 presidential election. The dispute involves the potential disqualification of vice presidential candidate Gibran Rakabuming Raka, who ran alongside Prabowo Subianto.

The losing presidential candidates, Anies Baswedan and Ganjar Pranowo, have challenged the election results, accusing the government of interference and unfair practices. They argue that the involvement of current president Joko Widodo and the use of social aid as a tool to influence the outcome have undermined the integrity of the election. The candidates are calling for a re-run of the election and the disqualification of Prabowo Subianto and Gibran Rakabuming Raka.

The composition of the Constitutional Court's panel of judges is predicted to be 3:3:2, with the possibility of a 4:4 deadlock. According to the Constitutional Court Law, if a 4:4 judge position occurs, the decision will depend on the stance of the chair of the full court. The current chair and vice chair of the Constitutional Court, Suhartoyo and Saldi Isra, have shown a commitment to restoring public trust in the court and have made decisions that go against the wishes of President Jokowi's regime.

Why this matters: The Constitutional Court's decision on this high-stakes election dispute will have far-reaching implications for Indonesia's democracy and political landscape. The outcome will not only determine the legitimacy of the 2024 presidential election but also test the independence and integrity of the country's judiciary in the face of alleged government interference.

Idrus Marham, the Secretary of the Prabowo-Gibran Strategic Working Team, has stated that disqualifying Gibran would create new problems rather than solve existing ones. The Prabowo Gibran camp believes that the Constitutional Court will reject the petitions submitted by the Anies-Muhaimin and Ganjar-Mahfud pairs, as the information and evidence presented by the two applicants is considered to be mostly in the form of narrative.

The Election Supervisory Body (Bawaslu) has stated that it is ready to carry out the Constitutional Court's decision, including supervising any re-voting if ordered. Bayu Dwi Anggono, the dean of the Law Faculty at Jember University, has expressed appreciation for the applicants' choice to settle the political dispute through the Constitutional Court, seeing it as a good development for Indonesia's constitutional democracy.

The Constitutional Court's decision is eagerly

Key Takeaways

  • Indonesia's Constitutional Court to rule on 2024 election dispute on April 22.
  • Losing candidates Anies and Ganjar challenge results, allege government interference.
  • Court panel composition may result in a 4:4 deadlock, with chair's decision crucial.
  • Disqualifying VP candidate Gibran could create new problems, Prabowo-Gibran camp says.
  • Court's decision will have far-reaching implications for Indonesia's democracy and judiciary.