CNCF Survey Reveals Kubernetes Cost Challenges Amid Cloud Optimization Efforts

The Cloud Native Computing Foundation's survey reveals that 49% of respondents experienced increased cloud costs since adopting Kubernetes, with 38% lacking Kubernetes cost monitoring. The survey highlights the need for better monitoring and FinOps optimization to address overprovisioning, lack of accountability, and technical debt.

author-image
Aqsa Younas Rana
New Update
CNCF Survey Reveals Kubernetes Cost Challenges Amid Cloud Optimization Efforts

CNCF Survey Reveals Kubernetes Cost Challenges Amid Cloud Optimization Efforts

The Cloud Native Computing Foundation (CNCF) has released its latest Cloud Native and Kubernetes FinOps Microsurvey, shedding light on the challenges organizations face in managing Kubernetes-related cloud costs. The survey findings indicate that while effective cost visibility tooling and FinOps practices lead to cloud cost optimization, many companies struggle with rising expenses and inefficiencies tied to their Kubernetes deployments.

Why this matters: As more businesses adoptcloud-native technologies, the ability to effectively manage and optimize cloud costs will be crucial for maintaining competitiveness and avoiding unnecessary expenses. Failure to address these challenges could lead to significant financial losses and hinder the adoption of innovative technologies.

According to the survey, 49% of respondents reported increased cloud costs since adopting Kubernetes, with 17% experiencing significant increases. For half of the respondents, Kubernetes accounts for less than a quarter of their total cloud spending. However, 15% allocate over half of their entire cloud budgets to Kubernetes alone. The survey also revealed a wide range of monthly cloud spending among organizations, with 21% spending less than $10,000, 26% under $50,000, and 22% exceeding $1 million.

Despite the importance of cost monitoring, the survey found that 38% of respondents have no Kubernetes cost monitoring in place, and only 19% have accurate showback capabilities. A mere 2% have implemented an active chargeback program to enforce responsibility. Among the cost monitoring tools used, AWS Cost Explorer leads at 55%, followed by GCP's cost tools (28%), Azure's cost management (23%), and Kubecost (23%).

The survey highlighted the critical role of FinOps optimization, with 98% of respondents emphasizing the importance of involving engineers, developers, and product teams in cost control efforts. A significant 75% expect to achieve full buy-in from these teams as active and effectivecloud budget hawks. Overprovisioning emerged as the top issue leading to overspending (70%), followed by a lack of individual or team-level responsibility for cloud costs (45%), and sprawl and technical debt (43%).

To address these challenges, 68% of respondents see advantages in making teams and individuals more aware of the need for spending discipline, while 58% agreed that improved collaboration and communication on consumption and spending would help rein in costs. Ajay Tripathy, Chief Technology Officer at Kubecost, noted, "Effective cost visibility tooling and FinOps practices do lead to cloud cost optimization. Organizations that complete their cloud transformations or are born in the cloud realize that any migration or scale project triggers a new challenge of cost optimizing those environments." Kubecost

As organizations continue to embrace Kubernetes andcloud-native technologies, the CNCF's survey underscores the importance of implementing robust cost monitoring, FinOps practices, and a culture of cost awareness. By addressing the challenges of overprovisioning, lack of accountability, and technical debt, companies can optimize their cloud spending and unlock the full potential of Kubernetes without breaking the bank.