Supreme Court Criticizes IMA President Over Remarks in Patanjali Case

The Supreme Court of India has expressed dissatisfaction with the unconditional apology submitted by Indian Medical Association (IMA) President Dr. RV Asokan for his critical remarks about the Court in an interview, highlighting the importance of maintaining the dignity and respect of the judiciary in India. The context revolves around a case filed by the IMA against Patanjali Ayurved over misleading ads that disparaged modern medicine, with the Court criticizing Dr. Asokan's comments and questioning his sense of responsibility." This description focuses on the primary topic of the Supreme Court's dissatisfaction with Dr. Asokan's apology, the main entities involved (Supreme Court, IMA, Dr. Asokan, and Patanjali Ayurved), and the context of the case. It also highlights the significant action of the Court's criticism and its implications for maintaining the dignity of the judiciary. The description provides objective and relevant details that will guide the AI in creating an accurate visual representation of the article's content.

author-image
Nitish Verma
New Update
Supreme Court Criticizes IMA President Over Remarks in Patanjali Case

Supreme Court Criticizes IMA President Over Remarks in Patanjali Case

The Supreme Court of India on Tuesday expressed dissatisfaction with the unconditional apology submitted by Indian Medical Association (IMA) President Dr. RV Asokan for his critical remarks about the Court in an interview. The Court was dealing with a case filed by the IMA against Patanjali Ayurved over misleading ads that disparaged modern medicine.

Why this matters: The Supreme Court's criticism of the IMA President's remarks highlights the importance of maintaining the dignity and respect of the judiciary in India. This incident also underscores the need for responsible behavior from public figures, especially those involved in high-stakes legal battles, to avoid undermining the authority of the courts.

Justice Hima Kohli said, "Dr. Asokan, you are also a citizen of this country. The amount of criticism judges face, why don't they react? Because personally we don't have much of an ego, we are magnanimous. We are entitled to take action, but very rarely we do." She also stated, "We do that seldom...We use our discretion with some sense of responsibility. But that does not mean you go to town with these kind of comments! What would you have done if other side made these kind of comments? You would have come running to this Court!"

Dr. Asokan had previously criticized the Supreme Court in an interview, saying it was "unfortunate" that the Court criticized the IMA and that its statements had demoralized private doctors. The Court had taken strong exception to Dr. Asokan's comments on April 30 and told the IMA to put its house in order and address unethical practices in modern medicine and hospitals.

While Dr. Asokan apologized unconditionally for his comments, the Court expressed dissatisfaction with his affidavit. Justice Amanullah asked, "You can't vent your feelings against the Court in the press like this. What made you go suddenly like this?" The Court questioned Dr. Asokan's sense of responsibility, asking why he did not give a public apology and why he did not make amends after the interview.

The IMA, which represents over 3.5 lakh doctors in India, has been at loggerheads with Patanjali Ayurved and its founder Baba Ramdev over the promotion of Ayurveda and yoga. In 2022, the IMA filed a plea in the Supreme Court alleging that Patanjali was carrying out a smear campaign against the Covid-19 vaccination drive and modern systems of medicine.

The Supreme Court bench, comprising Justices Hima Kohli and Ahsanuddin Amanullah, reserved its order on the contempt notices issued to yoga guru Baba Ramdev and others in the misleading ads case. The matter has been posted for next hearing in July. The Court's strong words for the IMA President reflect its dissatisfaction with comments made against the judiciary by parties involved in ongoing legal proceedings.

Key Takeaways

  • Supreme Court expresses dissatisfaction with IMA President's unconditional apology for critical remarks.
  • Court emphasizes importance of maintaining dignity and respect of the judiciary in India.
  • IMA President criticized Court for demoralizing private doctors, sparking strong reaction.
  • Court questions IMA President's sense of responsibility for venting feelings in the press.
  • Matter posted for next hearing in July, with Court reserving order on contempt notices.