Controversial Court Orders Raise Concerns Over Judicial Integrity in Nigeria

Nigerian judges Usman Na'Abba and Inyang Ekwo issued contentious ex parte orders in high-profile political cases without hearing opposing sides. The affected parties have lodged complaints with the Chief Justice of Nigeria, seeking a review of the judges' conduct.

author-image
Trim Correspondents
New Update
Controversial Court Orders Raise Concerns Over Judicial Integrity in Nigeria

Controversial Court Orders Raise Concerns Over Judicial Integrity in Nigeria

A series of contentious court orders issued by judges in Nigeria has sparked concerns about the integrity and impartiality of the country's legal system. Judges Usman Na'Abba of the High Court of Kano State and Inyang Ekwo of the Federal High Court in Abuja have come under scrutiny for issuing ex parte orders, restraining orders granted without hearing the opposing side, in politically charged cases.

Why this matters: The erosion of trust in Nigeria's judiciary can have far-reaching consequences for the country's democratic stability and the rule of law. If left unchecked, such abuses of power can undermine the credibility of the entire legal system and embolden further corruption.

On April 17, 2024, Judge Na'Abba issued an interim order restraining Abdullahi Ganduje, national chairman of the All Progressives Congress (APC), from parading himself as a party member, without hearing from Ganduje's side. Just five days later, Judge Na'Abba issued another ex parte order staying the execution of his first order, effectively canceling it.

Similarly, on April 5, 2024, Judge Ekwo of the Federal High Court in Abuja issued dispositive orders, final judgments that settle a matter, restraining leading members of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) from participating in party meetings, again without hearing from the affected parties. Compounding the issue, the case files reportedly disappeared, making it impossible for those impacted to process appeals.

Legal experts and observers have expressed alarm at these developments. Professor Chidi Odinkalu remarked, "I am surprised that lawyers can be so blind as to suffer the principles of law to be discredited." The use of ex parte orders in such high-profile political cases raises questions about due process and the rule of law.

Nigeria's legal system is based on the Common Law tradition inherited from British colonial rule, which relies heavily on legal precedent. Law reports exist to help lawyers and judges understand judicial decisions and reason by analogy to advise clients. However, the recent spate of controversial orders threatens to undermine public confidence in the judiciary.

The affected parties in the APC and PDP cases have lodged complaints with the Chief Justice of Nigeria, seeking a review of the judges' conduct. As of May 14, 2024, the fallout from these court orders continues to reverberate through Nigeria's legal and political circles. The integrity of the judicial system hangs in the balance as the nation grapples with the consequences of judges seemingly abusing their power.

Key Takeaways

  • Judges in Nigeria issue contentious ex parte orders in political cases, sparking concerns about judicial integrity.
  • Orders restrain party members from participating in meetings without hearing opposing sides, undermining due process.
  • Legal experts express alarm, citing erosion of trust in the judiciary and potential for further corruption.
  • Affected parties lodge complaints with the Chief Justice of Nigeria, seeking review of judges' conduct.
  • Incidents threaten to undermine public confidence in Nigeria's legal system and democratic stability.