Bridget Hutchcroft Seeks to Imprison Former Friend Over Unpaid £1.3M Loan

Bridget Hutchcroft, owner of Pandora Dress Agency, seeks to imprison former friend Ekaterina Barrett for contempt of court over an unpaid £1.3 million loan and £1.6 million High Court judgment. Barrett allegedly provided false evidence and failed to repay the loan, prompting Hutchcroft's legal team to accuse her of contempt.

author-image
Bijay Laxmi
New Update
Bridget Hutchcroft Seeks to Imprison Former Friend Over Unpaid £1.3M Loan

Bridget Hutchcroft Seeks to Imprison Former Friend Over Unpaid £1.3M Loan

Bridget Hutchcroft, 63, the owner of the prestigious Pandora Dress Agency in Knightsbridge, London, is seeking to imprison her former friend Ekaterina Barrett, 67, for contempt of court over an unpaid £1.3 million loan and a £1.6 million High Court judgment. Hutchcroft's boutique has been a fixture in Knightsbridge for over 70 years, with a clientele that includes celebrities like Princess Diana, Catherine Zeta-Jones, and Ava Gardner.

Why this matters: This case highlights the importance of upholding court judgments and the consequences of failing to do so, which can have far-reaching implications for individuals and businesses alike. It also raises questions about the accountability of individuals with significant financial resources and their obligations to fulfill their legal obligations.

Barrett, who introduced herself as a "connoisseur of high-end couture," became friends with Hutchcroft in 2017 and began visiting the boutique. During her divorce, Barrett borrowed £1.3 million from Hutchcroft, which she failed to repay. In October 2022, the High Court ordered Barrett to repay the loan plus interest, but she has not done so.

Hutchcroft's legal team claims that Barrett has shown contempt for the court and should be jailed. James McWilliams, Hutchcroft's lawyer, alleges that Barrett provided false evidence regarding her interest in a property in Monaco and her involvement in multiple legal proceedings in different jurisdictions. McWilliams also claims that an email sent by Barrett on May 3, stating that the case had already settled for £800,000 with a written agreement, is an "obvious forgery."

"In particular, she gave false evidence in relation to the nature of her interest in and connection to a property in Monaco, referred to throughout the examination as 'Saint Andre' - it being her evidence that it was not her property but her brother's," stated McWilliams. Hutchcroft believes that Barrett is still living in Monaco and has failed to attend court to defend her position. "Having visited her apartment in Monaco, I did believe that she had this huge trust fund that she had told me about," said Hutchcroft.

The case highlights the legal battle between Bridget Hutchcroft and Ekaterina Barrett over the substantial unpaid loan and High Court judgment. As Hutchcroft seeks to hold Barrett accountable for contempt of court, the allegations of false evidence and forgery add further complexity to the proceedings. The outcome of this case could have significant implications for both parties involved.

Key Takeaways

  • Bridget Hutchcroft seeks to jail Ekaterina Barrett for contempt of court over unpaid £1.3m loan.
  • Barrett failed to repay loan and £1.6m High Court judgment, claiming false financial difficulties.
  • Hutchcroft's boutique, Pandora Dress Agency, has served celebrities like Princess Diana and Ava Gardner.
  • Allegations of false evidence and forgery add complexity to the legal battle.
  • Case highlights importance of upholding court judgments and accountability for individuals with significant financial resources.