Conservative MP Criticizes Court Order Blocking New Yorker Article on Letby Trial

Conservative MP Sir David Davis criticizes a UK court order blocking access to a New Yorker article questioning the statistical evidence used in the trial of Lucy Letby, a nurse convicted of murdering seven babies and attempting to murder six others at the Countess of Chester Hospital between 2015 and 2016. The article's restricted access raises concerns about open justice, wrongful convictions, and the reliability of statistical evidence in high-stakes trials." This description focuses on the primary topic (the court order blocking access to the New Yorker article), the main entities (Sir David Davis, Lucy Letby, and the Countess of Chester Hospital), the context (the trial and conviction of Lucy Letby), and the significant actions and implications (the restriction of access to the article and its potential impact on open justice and wrongful convictions). The description provides objective and relevant details that will guide the AI in creating an accurate visual representation of the article's content.

author-image
Bijay Laxmi
New Update
Conservative MP Criticizes Court Order Blocking New Yorker Article on Letby Trial

Conservative MP Criticizes Court Order Blocking New Yorker Article on Letby Trial

Conservative MP Sir David Davis has criticized a UK court order that blocks access to a New Yorker article questioning the evidence used in the trial of Lucy Letby, a nurse convicted of murdering seven babies and attempting to murder six others at the Countess of Chester Hospital between 2015 and 2016.

The 13,000-word article, published in the New Yorker magazine on Monday, raises concerns about the statistical evidence used in Letby's trial. However, the court order prohibits access to the article in the UK, which Sir David Davis argues is "in defiance of open justice."

Why this matters: The case raises concerns about the reliability of statistical evidence in high-stakes trials and the potential for wrongful convictions. If the court order is upheld, it could set a precedent for restricting access to information that challenges the justice system, undermining public trust and accountability.

Letby, 34, was convicted in August 2023 and has submitted a bid to challenge her convictions at the Court of Appeal. If the appeal is declined, it will mark the end of the appeal process for Letby. A retrial is scheduled for June 2024 on a single count of attempted murder.

Sir David Davis stated, "Yesterday the New Yorker magazine published a 13,000-word inquiry into the Lucy Letby trial, which raised enormous concerns about both the logic and competence of the statistical evidence that was a central part of that trial." He added, "That article was blocked from publication on the UK internet, I understand because of a court order. Now, I'm sure that court order was well intended but it seems to me in defiance of open justice."

Justice Secretary Alex Chalk responded, saying, "Court orders must be obeyed and court orders can be displaced by someone applying to court for them to be removed." He emphasized, "I will just simply make a point on the Lucy Letby case – that jury's verdict must be respected. If there are grounds for an appeal, that should take place in the normal way."

The murders and attempted murders took place at the Countess of Chester Hospital between June 2015 and June 2016. Concerns about a spike in neonatal deaths were initially raised by Dr. Ravi Jayaram, a pediatrician, and his colleagues. However, hospital management dismissed their claims, and it took 11 months for the police to become involved in the investigation.

The New Yorker article, written by Rachel Aviv, is available to readers outside the UK but remains inaccessible to UK readers on the publication's website due to the court order restricting press coverage of Letby's ongoing appeal and retrial. UK readers trying to access the article are met with a message stating, "Oops. Our apologies. This is, almost certainly, not the page you were looking for."

Sir David Davis has called on the government to review the court order blocking access to the New Yorker article, arguing that it raises "enormous concerns" about the safety of Letby's conviction. The article highlights issues with the use of statistics in the trial, drawing comparisons to the Sally Clark case, where faulty statistics led to a wrongful conviction. As Letby awaits the decision on her appeal and faces a retrial next month, the case continues to raise questions about the evidence presented and the state of maternity care in the UK.

Key Takeaways

  • UK court order blocks access to New Yorker article questioning Lucy Letby's conviction.
  • Article raises concerns about statistical evidence used in Letby's trial.
  • Conservative MP Sir David Davis criticizes court order, citing "defiance of open justice."
  • Letby convicted of murdering 7 babies, attempting to murder 6 others; appeals conviction.
  • Case raises concerns about wrongful convictions, reliability of statistical evidence.